Which Type of Financial Adviser Do You Need? - Free Guide

How Do We Make Work Optional? Priya and David’s Case 💼🏖️

Prudence Zhu

CFP®, CPA, CFT™

Posted on:
January 17, 2026

This article continues our series of hypothetical client case studies, focusing on one of the most common questions: How Do We Make Work Optional?

Couples in their 40s and early 50s often want work to become a choice, not a necessity, especially after moving to a lower‑cost area and while juggling aging parents, changing careers, and multiple financial goals. For a hypothetical couple like Priya and David, building a work‑optional path means combining traditional retirement planning with tax‑aware investing, FIRE (Financial Independence, Retire Early) resources, scenario modeling, and coaching around a more flexible mindset for the next phase of life.🔥

This case study focuses on their goals, the planning framework, and desired outcomes, not on anyone’s emotional experience or endorsement.​

Hypothetical couple profile

Priya is in her late 40s and David is in his early 50s. They recently moved from a high‑cost coastal city to a lower‑tax state and are still adjusting to home‑improvement choices, state tax rules, and new employer benefits. They are child‑free by choice but want flexibility to support nieces, nephews, and other younger family members, and they are mindful of possible medical expenses for aging parents.​

They have established careers, employer retirement plans, IRAs, and both individual and joint taxable brokerage accounts that they manage themselves. Their main questions are:​

  • Can they make full‑time work optional in 3–5 years, and what would it take to get there?
  • How should they prioritize saving for financial independence, property upgrades or a second home, and helping family, while managing taxes wisely?
  • How can they use FIRE ideas without feeling pushed into extreme frugality or all‑or‑nothing early retirement?💭​

Key questions and planning framework

Priya and David’s situation reflects common questions for mid‑career, higher‑income couples who are serious about FIRE but want a realistic, grounded plan.​

  • What level of after‑tax spending can a work‑optional plan support if they scale back in their mid‑50s versus working into their early 60s?
  • How should contributions and withdrawals be sequenced across pre‑tax, Roth, and taxable accounts to maintain flexibility and manage tax brackets and future Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs)?​
  • How would a semi‑retirement phase, such as consulting or part‑time work, change their savings targets, risk profile, and timeline?​

The planning process is structured: clarify goals, review current resources, model scenarios, then design strategies that support a sustainable work‑optional path.​​

Clarifying “work optional” and FIRE

Planning starts by defining what work optional means for them, rather than picking a fixed retirement age.​

  • Conversations focus on what they want more of (travel, creative projects, volunteering, family time, second careers) and what they want less of (commuting, long weeks), and whether they intend to stop working entirely or simply scale back.
  • FIRE is framed as a flexible toolkit built around higher but sustainable savings, intentional spending, and disciplined investing, so they can adapt the ideas to their own values and lifestyle.​
  • The plan is designed to reflect all major goals: semi‑retirement or full retirement within the next several years, home remodeling and a vacation property, and planned healthcare and family support, with the aim of not running out of money over both lifetimes while preserving a reasonable cushion for surprises.​

Cash‑flow, accounts, and tax‑aware investing

Their real‑life cash flow and accounts are mapped with special attention to cost‑of‑living and tax changes after the move.​

  • Net income after taxes, payroll deductions, and benefits is tallied, and spending is grouped into essentials, lifestyle choices, and goals such as retirement, travel, property, and family support.
  • Employer plans, IRAs, Roth accounts, HSAs, and taxable accounts are inventoried by balance, tax type, and allocation to show where money sits and how it is invested.​​
  • Their current savings rate becomes a baseline, and modeling shows how raising savings, trimming spending, or delaying work optional would affect the probability of meeting their goals.

Because they are in peak earning years, tax‑aware planning strongly influences their timeline.​

  • Contributions: The plan evaluates how much to use tax‑advantaged accounts (401(k)/403(b), HSA, backdoor Roth where appropriate) while still building taxable accounts for pre‑59½ flexibility.​
  • Asset location: Investments are arranged so overall risk matches their timeline and more tax‑efficient assets sit in taxable accounts, with tax‑inefficient holdings in pre‑tax or Roth accounts where feasible.​
  • Pre‑RMD planning: For retirement in their mid‑50s or early 60s, modeling explores Roth conversions and strategic withdrawals in lower‑income years before RMDs to smooth lifetime taxes and reduce RMD shock.​

Scenarios and three‑bucket strategy

Scenario analysis shows how different choices could shape their work‑optional path.​

  • Models compare stopping work around 55 versus a phased exit with several years of consulting or part‑time work, evaluating success rates, ending portfolio values, and spending flexibility.
  • Alternatives for keeping their current home, downsizing later, or adding a second home are tested for impact on lifestyle and cash‑flow needs, along with what‑if cases for increased family support, higher healthcare costs, or extended travel.​

To connect long‑term plans to daily choices, a three‑bucket structure is used.​

  • Short term (0–2 years): A combined emergency and Life Flexibility bucket holds one to two years of essential expenses plus near‑term costs, kept in high‑yield savings, money market funds, or short‑term treasuries.​
  • Mid term (3–7 years): A Transition to Work Optional bucket funds the first years after reducing work, including income gaps, bigger trips, exploratory projects, and taxes on planned Roth conversions. It is invested in a diversified mix with meaningful bonds and modest equities.​
  • Long term (8+ years): A Financial Independence bucket holds retirement and long‑term portfolios invested primarily in growth‑oriented diversified assets to support spending well into their 80s and 90s.​

Automated transfers send monthly surplus into these buckets according to a written plan, so core retirement savings, short‑term safety, and mid‑term transition goals are funded in a steady, intentional way.✅​

Community, education, and ongoing support

Because Priya and David want balanced FIRE guidance, community and education can reinforce their plan.​

  • The plan notes that many FIRE followers later choose some form of paid work, often to maintain purpose or benefits, and emphasizes a flexible semi‑FIRE or work‑optional path instead of a single rigid retirement date.​
  • Communities and events such as CampFI, Millionaire Money Mentors, and Bogleheads conferences, along with similar groups, are suggested as optional resources where they can learn from peers and bring new ideas back into their plan.​
  • Intentional Planning conversations help clarify priorities, map an action plan, and revisit evolving needs, aiming to use their resources to reach life goals as early as realistically possible while minimizing regrets.

A comprehensive engagement for a hypothetical couple like Priya and David typically includes 20–25 hours over several meetings, coordinated recommendations across tax, investment, insurance, estate, and cash‑flow areas, and ongoing reviews to track progress, update assumptions, and adjust savings, spending, or timelines as life and markets change. The framework is designed to turn their vision of a work‑optional life into specific savings and investment decisions, to support both stability and flexibility, and to provide a written roadmap and review rhythm as they move toward financial independence.

Disclosure: This case study is hypothetical and does not represent any specific client. It is for illustration only to show the types of planning strategies a fee‑only advisory firm may provide. Results vary; past performance does not guarantee future outcomes.

‍

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Heading 4

Heading 5
Heading 6

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Block quote

Ordered list

  1. Item 1
  2. Item 2
  3. Item 3

Unordered list

  • Item A
  • Item B
  • Item C

Text link

Bold text

Emphasis

Superscript

Subscript

Discover your financial freedom today

LET’S CHAT. SCHEDULE A 30-MINUTE CALL

Designations and Affiliations

Media Mentions